Q

Why backup your libraries to virtual tape instead of SAVF?

If SAVF files can be FTP'd to anywhere, why is virtual tape necessary? The answer: Many libraries versus just one.

Why backup your libraries to a virtual tape drive when you can use a save file (SAVF)? Both can be FTP'd anywhere in the world onto any platform?
The major reason is that you can save MANY libraries using one save command to a virtual tape and only ONE library per save command to a Save File.
This was first published in October 2008
This Content Component encountered an error

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

0 comments

Oldest 

Forgot Password?

No problem! Submit your e-mail address below. We'll send you an email containing your password.

Your password has been sent to:

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchEnterpriseLinux

SearchDataCenter

Close