We want to set REUSEDLT flag to Yes on physical files. We have logical files with LIFO/FIFO keywords. We renamed...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
the logicals with LIFO/FIFO and created identical logicals. The database manager rebuilds the index. We have clients that have millions of records in their database and it take too long to rebuild index.
My questions are: Why are the access paths is rebuilt? Is it not supposed to share access path of re-named logicals?
Did you use exactly the same fields as key fields with the same selections? Did you add any fields to the key? If you did not change anything but simply got rid of LIFO, FIFO or FCFO, then I guess that for the system, an access path with LIFO, FIFO or FCFO is not the same as an access path with the same fields but none of the above. This results in the system having to rebuild the access paths.
MORE INFORMATION ON THIS TOPIC
Search400's targeted search engine: Get relevant information on DB2/400.
The Best Web Links: tips, tutorials and more.
Check out this online event, Getting the Most out of SQL & DB2 UDB for the iSeries.
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.